The puzzle of self-reflection

After dipping my toe into the waters of the blogosphere a couple of years ago, I have decided to give it another, more focussed go.

The broad topic I will be considering is the self – the “I” that we carry around with us from one day to the next.

A fair few articles and books have been written recently on how the conscious self is only the tip of a neural iceberg, with computations going on behind the scenes that “we” have very little input into. For example, where the salad is placed in the canteen influences our decision to pick it up for lunch, without us being aware of this influence. Experimental results such as these are striking, and contribute to a view that the self is weak, and perhaps inconsequential to the real work being done on the shop floor.

But there is a paradox here. Humans (and perhaps other animal species) have the ability to self-reflect. Did I make the right decision? Am I really feeling sad, or is it just the weather? How am I doing in terms of being a good person?

So why do we engage in self-reflection at all? What if we were just highly complex automatons? Would it make any difference if there were no “tip” to the iceberg? Our society currently says that yes, it would make a big difference. Insight into our behaviour is taken as a signature of rational choice (think of a time when you excused your behaviour with “I just wasn’t thinking”). And the boundaries of self-reflection are therefore becoming central to how society ascribes blame and punishment, how we approach psychiatric disorders, and how we view human nature.

There has been recent scientific progress in understanding the brain mechanisms underlying subjective experience and self-reflection.  For example, we now have greater understanding of why certain sensory stimuli burst into awareness; how reported pain can be influenced by expectations; and why we are aware of making some errors but not others. In other words, modern cognitive neuroscience aims to understand not only the low-level machinery that underlies perception and action, but also our beliefs and sense of self that accompany it.

These are exciting times for a science of the self. However, the science is also challenging our concepts of responsibility, insight and self-control. The earlier we debate these discoveries as a society, the better prepared we will be to decide whether, and how, they should affect our legal and healthcare institutions that rely on these concepts when making decisions.

In the coming weeks and months I plan to use this space to explore questions such as these. I’ll aim for a new post every week, or perhaps every other week, my research and the distractions of New York permitting. If anyone has any suggestions for topics, I’d love to hear about them at fleming.sm@gmail.com.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “The puzzle of self-reflection

    • Hi Taylor,

      Thanks for the tip – I am just getting to grips with the software. You should find an RSS link here now. As for guest blogging, that is a great idea – I’m going to set out the theme in a few more posts first, and then look into your suggestion.

      Thanks for reading!

      Steve

  1. This is such a cool project and right in line with my current interests! I will definitely check up on the blog…Maybe a topic for a future post could be what makes for self-reflection. Those examples sound like they could be characterized as mere reflection. Is it the inward focus that changes their status? The fact that they are concerned with acts? I look forward to more!

  2. Pingback: Scientist on the Science of the Self | Brains

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s